<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comment&#252;s on: The Insanity of U.S. Intervention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalcartel.com/2008/05/05/the-insanity-of-us-intervention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalcartel.com/2008/05/05/the-insanity-of-us-intervention/</link>
	<description>An Ideological Roundtable</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gino</title>
		<link>http://politicalcartel.com/2008/05/05/the-insanity-of-us-intervention/#comment-3420</link>
		<dc:creator>gino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 01:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalcartel.wordpress.com/?p=400#comment-3420</guid>
		<description>“[O]f the eighteen regime changes forced by the Unite States in the 20th century, only 5 resulted in democracy, and in the case of wars fought unilaterally, the number goes down to one — Panama” (hardly an applauded event)."

I would question the idea that these "forced regime changes" were made with the notion of creating a democratic government.  Protection of US interests would be a more acceptable explanation.  

I think that is certainly true regarding Latin America and anything that transpires in the Middle East.  

"Is the Iraq occupation catastrophic enough in terms of life, money, and prestige wasted that it will cause our country to realize the long-standing error of its international ways?"

I would certainly hope so, but I don't believe it will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“[O]f the eighteen regime changes forced by the Unite States in the 20th century, only 5 resulted in democracy, and in the case of wars fought unilaterally, the number goes down to one — Panama” (hardly an applauded event).&#8221;</p>
<p>I would question the idea that these &#8220;forced regime changes&#8221; were made with the notion of creating a democratic government.  Protection of US interests would be a more acceptable explanation.  </p>
<p>I think that is certainly true regarding Latin America and anything that transpires in the Middle East.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Is the Iraq occupation catastrophic enough in terms of life, money, and prestige wasted that it will cause our country to realize the long-standing error of its international ways?&#8221;</p>
<p>I would certainly hope so, but I don&#8217;t believe it will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David M. Manes</title>
		<link>http://politicalcartel.com/2008/05/05/the-insanity-of-us-intervention/#comment-3419</link>
		<dc:creator>David M. Manes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 00:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalcartel.wordpress.com/?p=400#comment-3419</guid>
		<description>Is it possible for America to regain some sanity?  Is the Iraq occupation catastrophic enough in terms of life, money, and prestige wasted that it will cause our country to realize the long-standing error of its international ways?

A lot of people thought that Vietnam was that paradigm-shifting conflict, but in retrospect, it really hasn't been.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible for America to regain some sanity?  Is the Iraq occupation catastrophic enough in terms of life, money, and prestige wasted that it will cause our country to realize the long-standing error of its international ways?</p>
<p>A lot of people thought that Vietnam was that paradigm-shifting conflict, but in retrospect, it really hasn&#8217;t been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
